| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi Guogang,
Thank you for preparing a document.
For signaling forwarding capability, do we need to inform the type of DL Data Forwarding (whether it's only MSDUs or not) in the SMD Information element?
If necessary, could we consider increasing the DL Data Forwarding bit from 1 to 2?
This way, we wouldn't need the sentence stating, "The DL Data Forwarding field and the Simplified DL Data Forwarding field in the SMD Information element shall not be simultaneously set to 1."
For the description of "37.16.10 Downlink Data forwarding",
is the resolution for #5021 only applied when the DL Data Forwarding field is set to 1 and A-MSDU forwarding will occur?
Best regards,
Ryuichi
差出人: huangguogang <000017b1384624cd-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
送信: 2025 年 11 月 9 日 (日曜日) 22:32 宛先: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 件名: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] LB291 CR for data forwarding Dear Seamless Roaming TTT members,
I’ve prepared a CR document to address the comments on the data forwarding. Please review and share any feedback in this email thread.
Regards Guogang Huang
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |