Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

[STDS-802-11-TGBN] 答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] LB291 CR for data forwarding



Dear Seamless Roaming TTT members,

 

Ive uploaded a new version (11-25/1993r1) based on comments. Please review and share any feedback in this email thread.

 

 

Regards

Guogang Huang

发件人: huangguogang
发送时间: 20251110 22:13
收件人: 'Ryuichi.Hirata@xxxxxxxx' <Ryuichi.Hirata@xxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: 答复: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] LB291 CR for data forwarding

 

Hi Ryuichi,

 

Thanks for your comments. Please find my response inline.

 

 

Regards

Guogang Huang

发件人: Ryuichi.Hirata@xxxxxxxx [mailto:Ryuichi.Hirata@xxxxxxxx]
发送时间: 20251110 18:20
收件人: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; huangguogang <huangguogang1@xxxxxxxxxx>
主题: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] LB291 CR for data forwarding

 

Hi Guogang,

 

Thank you for preparing a document.

 

For signaling forwarding capability, do we need to inform the type of DL Data Forwarding (whether it's only MSDUs or not) in the SMD Information element?

[HGG]The non-AP MLD’s behaviors are different under these two DL data forwarding types. Specifically, the non-AP MLD shall discard the subsequent MSDUs/A-MSDUs behind a hole if only MSDU forwarding is supported. If the A-MSDU forwarding is supported, the non-AP MLD needs to keep its reordering buffer when all the links with the current AP MLD are removed.

If necessary, could we consider increasing the DL Data Forwarding bit from 1 to 2?

This way, we wouldn't need the sentence stating, "The DL Data Forwarding field and the Simplified DL Data Forwarding field in the SMD Information element shall not be simultaneously set to 1."

[HGG] I’m not sure whether it’s good to change the existing signaling format at this stage. But I’m open to further discussion.

 

For the description of "37.16.10 Downlink Data forwarding",

is the resolution for #5021 only applied when the DL Data Forwarding field is set to 1 and A-MSDU forwarding will occur?

[HGG] The resolution for CID 5021 is applied to both of these two cases. Based on the current Spec., individually addressed MSDUs with the same TID value and addressed to the same destination shall not be reordered. The essence of this ‘shall’ requirement is MSDUs generated from a traffic stream shall be in-order delivery, i.e. the same order of the data delivery to the next MAC process of the receiver as the one arrived at the MAC SAP of the transmitter (regardless it is the current AP MLD or the target AP MLD).

 

 

Best regards,

Ryuichi

 


差出人: huangguogang <000017b1384624cd-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
送信: 2025 11 9 (日曜日) 22:32
宛先: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
件名: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] LB291 CR for data forwarding

 

Dear Seamless Roaming TTT members, Ive prepared a CR document to address the comments on the data forwarding. Please review and share any feedback in this email thread. 11-25/1993: LB291 CR for data forwarding (6 CIDs) Regards Guogang

Dear Seamless Roaming TTT members,

 

Ive prepared a CR document to address the comments on the data forwarding. Please review and share any feedback in this email thread.

 

  • 11-25/1993: LB291 CR for data forwarding (6 CIDs)

 

Regards

Guogang Huang

 


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1


To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1