Thanks Leif/Bin/Alfred for the suggestion during the call.
After checking 11mf, I notice that the phrases of “non-zero” and “loaded/populated” are not used for IFFT, and only “null” is used. I am proposing to make the following changes to the sentence:
- “The base OFDM symbol is generated by performing
a 64-point IFFT
of
with TBD non-zero
null tones subcarriers and pre-appending the last 0.8us waveform as the cyclic prefix.”
Let me know if you have other suggestions to the wording.
Thanks,
Rui
Hi Leif,
Thanks for the information. I will make the change to 2.4GHz text as suggested.
For S1G, looks like there are different interpretations of the motion text.
@lipanpan (D), do you want to bring another SP/motion to clarify
your intention? or I can leave out S1G waveform text for now.
Thanks,
Rui
|
Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report this email' button
|
Hi Rui,
The way I recall the discussion related to motion #94 is that it originally said CW, but when Joerg asked if the intention really was to have a carrier wave the answer was that the intention was to say that it
should be single carrier (and not OFDM), and therefore the SP was changed to single carrier.
I believe the spec text therefore should read as the passed motion.
A minor editorial thing. In 40.3.3.1, I suggest writing
. The base OFDM symbol is generated by performing 64-point IFFT of TBD
non-zero tones
Instead of
The base OFDM symbol is generated by performing 64-point IFFT of TBD
loaded tones
BR,
Leif
Hi Bo,
Please help to add the following PDT to the agenda:
Hi TTT members,
After confirming with the motion mover for the S1G carrier definition, I keep the CW definition in the PDT. Please review if you have any comments or suggestions.
Thanks,
Rui
|
Caution: This is an external email. Please take care when clicking links or opening attachments. When in doubt, report the message using the 'Report this email' button
|
Hi Bo,
Please add the following contributions to the MAC agenda:
11-25/2037r0, “AMP UL Channel Indication”, Ian Bajaj (Huawei)
11-25/2038r0, “Implementation for AMP Operation Status Reporting”, Ian Bajaj (Huawei)
11-25/2039r0, “AMP Contention-based Power Management”, Ian Bajaj (Huawei) – prefer to present with 11-25/2035r0
Thanks and Regards
Ian
Hello Bo
Please add the following contribution to the PHY agenda. Preferred time slots: PM or AM2.
DCN 11-25-2041-00-00bp :
“Power and Data Rate Implications of TX Power Configurability of Active AMP STAs,”, Dror Regev (Huawei).
Thanks in advance,
Dror
Hi Bo,
Please add the following contribution to the PHY agenda. Preferred time slots: AM1 or AM2. If possible, please schedule mine right after Steve's contribution .
DCN 11-25-2027-00-00bp :
“AMP Downlink Special Segment Study – Part 2,”, Manideep Dunna(Qualcomm).
Thanks,
Manideep.
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1