Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBP] SP for DCN 11-25-1841-01-00bp

[Sam Shi <Sam.Shi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Solomon,

One question for the proposal. I consider phy deal, MAC delay, RxTx time, etc. as a process delay. Do we really want to couple the processing delay to SIFS? 

One thought can be we still keep SIFS as 16 µs but add those implementation dependent delays on top of the SIFS (16 µs). In that sense, we do not extend SIFS to 50 µs (or 60, 70).

Thanks,

Sam

---

From: Solomon Trainin <solomon.trainin1@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2025 10:57 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBP] SP for DCN 11-25-1841-01-00bp

Hi Bo,

Please add to the SP list regarding DCN 11-25-1841-01-00bp

 

SP 1

What value of the aSIFSTime characteristic do you consider relevant?

–       50 µs

–       60 µs

–       70 µs

 

SP 2

 

Do you agree?

Instruct the TGbp editor to include the following table in paragraph 40:

 

Table xyz AMP PHY characteristics

Characteristics	Value
aSIFSTime	50us
aRxPHYDelay	Implementation dependent
aMACProcessingDelay	Implementation dependent
aRxTxTurnaroundTime	Implementation dependent

 

Best Regards,

Solomon Trainin

+972547885738

 

Virus-free.www.avg.com

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1