Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802.3_B10GAUTO] P802.3cy Updated Comment files available and August 23rd meeting reminder.

So, looking at Bob’s 361 & 381, as far as I’m concerned these should be under editorial license.

On 361:

Bob’s proposed remedy is:

 

Move editorial instruction below subclause title. Instruction at this location should be

"Replace Figure 105-1 (as modified by P802.3cz/D3.2) with the below which adds a

protocol stack for 25GBASE-T1 and adds NOTE-2."

 

Looking at 347, I see the response with regards to the figure being:

"Replace Figure >>105<<-1 (>>as modified by P802.3cz/D3.2<<, adding stack for

25GBASE-T1 and adding NOTE 2) as follows:"

 

So first, we need to fix “3.2” - but I’d suggest just state it as IEEE Std 802.3cz-202x as Bob seems to suggest below, because otherwise we’ll be chasing drafts…

And second, it seems he wants us to add “move the editing instruction below the subclause title” – I’d think that’s in editorial license, but if Marek wants it in the database, we could put it there.  Hopefully that handles that, but both seem editorial license to me.  You’d never be aligning to obsolete drafts intentionally.

 

As far as 381 is concerned, My opinion is that alignment with the current draft of other standards in-flight – especially of frontmatter or parts unrelated to this draft, e.g., additional stacks in figures…) -  is under Editorial license…

 

-george

 

From: NATALIE WIENCKOWSKI <nwienckowski@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2022 12:29 PM
To: STDS-802-3-B10GAUTO@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [802.3_B10GAUTO] P802.3cy Updated Comment files available and August 23rd meeting reminder.

 

Dear P802.3cy participants,

 

Updated D2.0 comment files are available in xlxs and pdf formats.

 

After the meeting ended today, and after the files were posted, we received a request from Bob Grow to remove additional comments from the EZ bucket.

 

#347 — Proposed response does not cover all of my concerns in my #361 (also flawed by reference to D2.3 rather than to be approved Std).

#381 (also #363, #365, #367, 368) — Pull from EZ unless following concern is covered under Editor license.  Current draft is P802.3/D2.3 (I did a quick scan and did not find any D2.2 to D2.3 changes that would affect the alignment).  I should have avoided specifying D2.2 in my comments and the response should similarly propose alignment with the current draft of P802.3cz. (I hope we get zero D2.3 comments and thus will be D3.0 before the end of the month.)  Most of the “also” comments listed include "P802.3cz/D2.2” in an editor instruction when it should be “IEEE Std 802.3cz-202x”.

#514 — Suggested remedy assumes #513 would be accepted (proposed reject).  (#514 SuggestedRemedy includes change from MBd to GBd value in addition to change from “rates” to “rate”.)

 

There was a question on comment #580 during comment resolution which Ragnar has already addressed on the reflector.

 

Comments with the CommentStatus "D" are the ones that have not yet been resolved.  This includes all comments categorized as "EZ".

 

We reviewed the presentation associated with Comment #465, but did not resolve the comment.  Please review the presentation and be prepared to resolve this comment at tomorrow's meeting.

 

Please review these, and all other Proposed Responses and be prepared to discuss them during our next meeting on Tuesday, August 23rd at 10 am EDT.



Presentations that go along with the comments can be found on the August Interims page.



Thanks,



Natalie Wienckowski

General Motors

P802.3cy Vice Chair and ad hoc Chair

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-B10GAUTO list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-B10GAUTO&A=1

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-B10GAUTO list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-B10GAUTO&A=1