|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
Regarding RSTP/MSTP YANG …
From: Rouyer, Jessy (Nokia - US/Dallas) <jessy.rouyer@xxxxxxxxx>
Regarding LLDP YANG as an equivalent to LLDP-EXT-DOT3-MIB, I agree with Mick and Paul: the transition from IEEE Std 802.1AB-2005 over time to IEEE Std 802.3 calls in my view for 802.3 to determine the best course of action.
Regarding RSTP/MSTP YANG, the work would require a new 802.1 PAR and CSD in my view. Of course this would require volunteer(s) to step up to facilitate PAR/CSD generation and, if approved, draft development. I would expect such work to be of interest outside 802.1, for example in BBF.
From: stds-802-yang@xxxxxxxx <stds-802-yang@xxxxxxxx>
On Behalf Of Mick Seaman
On the 802.3 LLDP use, agree with Paul.
On missing RSTP/MSTP parameters, I believe that this would be best covered by a new PAR. It is probably specialized enough to make attaching it to another project a drag on both it, and the specialized work of the other project. That makes the question as to whether it could be argued to be 'editorial corrections and omissions in the description of existing functionality' moot (also the 'errors and omissions' text in the Qcw PAR is more narrowly worded). It should not be a large project, the only difficulty is reviewer bandwidth - making sure we don't accidentally change the existing functionality.
On 8/4/2021 11:47 AM, Paul Congdon wrote:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-YANG list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-YANG&A=1 [listserv.ieee.org]
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-YANG list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-YANG&A=1