|
Perfect. This addresses my first
comment (a); the second comment (b) is also easy to accommodate.
Best regards, Rene
On 1/16/2015 9:58 AM, Zuniga, Juan Carlos wrote:
Hi Rene,
We amended the
text and a new revision has been posted:
https://mentor.ieee.org/privecsg/dcn/15/privecsg-15-0004-01-0000-privacy-recommendation-par-csd-proposal.pptx
We will discuss
this new text in our Feb 4 Teleconference and the plan is to
pre-circulate it amongst WGs for consideration at the March
plenary meeting.
Please take a
look at the new text and send your comments to the list or
voice them at the teleconference.
Best,
Juan Carlos
Hi Juan Carlos:
Thanks for the draft write-up and apologies for only
seeing this now (after your evening session).
I have two comment for now:
a) Slide 4: Shouldn't one also suggest something for
existing standards, rather than only for new ones? After
all, some experiments carried out at IEEE and IETF
meetings related to using an ephemeral MAC address rather
than a static 48-bit or 64-bit address, using existing
deployed laptops, etc.(alluded to on Slide 14)
b) Slide 11: I would suggest adding 802.15 to the list of
802 standards where privacy would be at play. {As you may
recall, I had a presentation (see [1] below) on addressing
and privacy aspects in the 6lo group at the IETF-91
meeting in November (where many 6lo stakeholders use
802.15.4 transceivers). For slides, see [1] below.}
[1] http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/slides/slides-91-6lo-4.pdf
Best regards, Rene
On 1/15/2015 6:41 PM, Zuniga, Juan Carlos wrote:
Hello,
I have uploaded a PAR/CSD text as
requested on Tuesday. This will be a straw man proposal
for discussion during our evening session later today:
https://mentor.ieee.org/privecsg/dcn/15/privecsg-15-0004-00-0000-privacy-recommendation-par-csd-proposal.pptx
Best,
Juan Carlos
--
email: rstruik.ext@xxxxxxxxx | Skype: rstruik
cell: +1 (647) 867-5658 | US: +1 (415) 690-7363
--
email: rstruik.ext@xxxxxxxxx | Skype: rstruik
cell: +1 (647) 867-5658 | US: +1 (415) 690-7363
|