Re: stds-802-mobility: March agenda
Bob,
As I've inidicated before, I am in favor starting the 802.20 plenary
at 1pm.
Thanks
Mike
>
> All, whether you are for or against moving the opening 802.20 plenary at
> 1:00pm rather than at 4:00pm, please make your preference known by a quick
> email to this reflector if you haven't already done so. Dawn needs to
> know
> what our Monday afternoon meeting room requirements are by this Friday, so
> Jerry needs to make a decision by then and let Dawn know.
>
> Jerry, when you have made the final decision please email Dawn (either
> way)
> copying the reflector so that we can plan based on the available meeting
> time.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Robert D. Love
> President, LAN Connect Consultants
> 7105 Leveret Circle Raleigh, NC 27615
> Phone: 919 848-6773 Mobile: 919 810-7816
> email: rdlove@ieee.org Fax: 208 978-1187
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Mollenauer" <jmollenauer@technicalstrategy.com>
> To: <stds-802-mobility@ieee.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 10:15 PM
> Subject: stds-802-mobility: March agenda
>
>
>>
>> To 802.20 participants:
>>
>> I'd like to add my support to Bob Love's proposal that we start the
>> 82.20 meeting immediately after lunch on Monday. The so-called wireless
>> plenary may be beneficial to 802.11 and 802.15 people, but there is
>> little that goes on that is as important to us as moving our own
>> standard forward. There is a full plenary (if that is not too redundant
>> a phrase) on Monday morning where issues of interest to all groups are
>> expected to be shared and milestones reported. This does not have to be
>> done over in more detail right afterward at a wireless meeting.
>>
>> Making the wireless plenary count toward attendance credit is a bad
>> idea. The full plenary has never been counted toward attendance and
>> there is little justification to do so in this case. It is bad to be
>> delayed in reaching our goal, and it is worse to be forced to sit
>> through two hours of mostly-irrelevant material during the delay.
>>
>> Jim Mollenauer
>>
>>
>>
>
>