RE: stds-802-mobility: March agenda
My preference is for 1:00PM.
-Vince
Vincent D. Park
park@flarion.com
Flarion Technologies Inc.
Bedminster One
135 Route 202/206 South
Bedminster NJ 07921
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-stds-802-mobility@majordomo.ieee.org
> [mailto:owner-stds-802-mobility@majordomo.ieee.org] On Behalf
> Of Robert D. Love
> Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 9:51 AM
> To: Jerry Upton; stds-802-mobility@ieee.org
> Subject: Re: stds-802-mobility: March agenda
>
>
>
> All, whether you are for or against moving the opening 802.20
> plenary at
> 1:00pm rather than at 4:00pm, please make your preference
> known by a quick
> email to this reflector if you haven't already done so. Dawn
> needs to know
> what our Monday afternoon meeting room requirements are by
> this Friday, so
> Jerry needs to make a decision by then and let Dawn know.
>
> Jerry, when you have made the final decision please email
> Dawn (either way)
> copying the reflector so that we can plan based on the
> available meeting
> time.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Robert D. Love
> President, LAN Connect Consultants
> 7105 Leveret Circle Raleigh, NC 27615
> Phone: 919 848-6773 Mobile: 919 810-7816
> email: rdlove@ieee.org Fax: 208 978-1187
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Jim Mollenauer" <jmollenauer@technicalstrategy.com>
> To: <stds-802-mobility@ieee.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 10:15 PM
> Subject: stds-802-mobility: March agenda
>
>
> >
> > To 802.20 participants:
> >
> > I'd like to add my support to Bob Love's proposal that we start the
> > 82.20 meeting immediately after lunch on Monday. The
> so-called wireless
> > plenary may be beneficial to 802.11 and 802.15 people, but there is
> > little that goes on that is as important to us as moving our own
> > standard forward. There is a full plenary (if that is not
> too redundant
> > a phrase) on Monday morning where issues of interest to all
> groups are
> > expected to be shared and milestones reported. This does
> not have to be
> > done over in more detail right afterward at a wireless meeting.
> >
> > Making the wireless plenary count toward attendance credit is a bad
> > idea. The full plenary has never been counted toward attendance and
> > there is little justification to do so in this case. It is
> bad to be
> > delayed in reaching our goal, and it is worse to be forced to sit
> > through two hours of mostly-irrelevant material during the delay.
> >
> > Jim Mollenauer
> >
> >
> >
>
>