Re: [802-20-GENERAL:] March Plenary Postings

[Jerry1upton@AOL.COM]

Anna,

I do not understand your point.

If your contribution is a proposal to amend or correct the minutes then it should have been sent as a proposed correction.

The approval of the Jan. minutes is before any contribution.

I suggest you explain this when we move to approve the minutes.

Regards,

Jerry Upton

 

 

In a message dated 3/5/2006 8:51:00 PM Central Standard Time, a.tee@SAMSUNG.COM writes:

Dear Jerry and all,

 

In the original high-level agenda for March Plenary, you have scheduled a time slot of 1 hour on Monday for contributions. However, in the proposed detail agenda that was posted on Friday, March 3, you have not scheduled any contribution for discussion on Monday. Would you please re-schedule the agenda so that contribution C802.20-06/15 can be presented and discussed on Monday, as it is related to the agenda item: "Review and approve Jan. meeting minutes"?

 

Best regards,

Anna.