Re: +++PROPOSED RULE CHANGE LETTER BALLOT
I have a concern with the wording in 126.96.36.199.2 which states "A quorum is
required at other Working Group meetings or in between meetings."
Surely, a quorum is required to conduct certain business, but the present
wording could be mis-interpreted to indicate the meeting itself is out of order
if no quorum exists.
I propose an editorial change of the sentence to capture the following spirit:
A quorum is required at other Working Group meetings or in between meetings
to conduct working group votes.
Is there support for this change, and is there concensus that what I am
proposing is only an editorial change to the wording in the changes now being
Robert D. Love
Program Manager, IBM ACS - US
Chair IEEE 802.5 Token Ring Working Group
500 Park Offices Phone: 919 543-2746
P. O. Box 12195 CNPA/656 Fax: 419 715-0359
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA E-Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org