Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] Std 802 Resolution

If I am interpretting this note correctly, then there is a serious problem.

A) The document was changed. 

B) A recirculation ballot was conducted.  

C) The recirculation ballot produced two 
   new negative ballots on the changed material.

D) Rebuttals were to the negative comments appear to have been produced.
   (I cannot tell who produced them.)

E) The negative ballot comments and rebuttals
   have not been recirculated.

After a recirc, a document must be submitted to RevCom.  If this
document were submitted to RevCom as is, with the results of the
recirc as is, it would not be approved.  RevCom would instruct the
sponsor to conduct another recirculation.


Jim Carlo wrote:
> The Standards Board will receive an information note, per the note below,
> and Std 802 will be published with due speed. Thanks to Tony for his
> perseverance on this matter, and many discussions with Geoff and Paul on
> this issue. I think the attachment is self-explanatory.
> We will still need to monitor the finalized IEEE-802 Mark Policy, which will
> be discussed and approved by the BOG.
> Jim Carlo ( Cellular:1-214-693-1776
> Voice&Fax:1-214-853-5274
> Vice Chair, IEEE-SA Standards Board
> Chair, IEEE802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee
>   ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                              Name: Std_802-Resolution.pdf
>    Std_802-Resolution.pdf    Type: Acrobat (application/pdf)
>                          Encoding: base64