Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] Std 802 Resolution


         a balloter on this standard
         a member of REVCOM
         a member of PROCOM
         a member of the Standards Board

I supports Howard's concern.


At 01:15 PM 9/28/01 -0700, Howard Frazier wrote:

>If I am interpretting this note correctly, then there is a serious problem.
>A) The document was changed.
>B) A recirculation ballot was conducted.
>C) The recirculation ballot produced two
>    new negative ballots on the changed material.
>D) Rebuttals were to the negative comments appear to have been produced.
>    (I cannot tell who produced them.)
>E) The negative ballot comments and rebuttals
>    have not been recirculated.
>After a recirc, a document must be submitted to RevCom.  If this
>document were submitted to RevCom as is, with the results of the
>recirc as is, it would not be approved.  RevCom would instruct the
>sponsor to conduct another recirculation.
>Jim Carlo wrote:
> >
> > The Standards Board will receive an information note, per the note below,
> > and Std 802 will be published with due speed. Thanks to Tony for his
> > perseverance on this matter, and many discussions with Geoff and Paul on
> > this issue. I think the attachment is self-explanatory.
> >
> > We will still need to monitor the finalized IEEE-802 Mark Policy, which 
> will
> > be discussed and approved by the BOG.
> >
> > Jim Carlo ( Cellular:1-214-693-1776
> > Voice&Fax:1-214-853-5274
> > Vice Chair, IEEE-SA Standards Board
> > Chair, IEEE802 LAN/MAN Standards Committee
> >
> > 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
> --------------------------
> >                              Name: Std_802-Resolution.pdf
> >    Std_802-Resolution.pdf    Type: Acrobat (application/pdf)
> >                          Encoding: base64