Re: [802SEC] Explanation regarding the Rules change motions
The rules change procedure has been satisfied to my satisfaction.
At 11:52 AM +0000 02/01/24, Hayes, Vic (Vic) wrote:
>I have to apologize for an omission on my part in the process for rules
>change and ask that you nevertheless participate and allow the continuation
>of the process.
>To my great concern, Paul Nikolich drew my attention to the fact that the
>required 60 days before the Plenary meeting was already passed before I send
>out the ballots.
>To my defense, I can only give you the fact that I was distracted and
>concerned that the requirement in our rules:
>"shall distribute the proposed change to all persons who have attended the
>Plenary Session or one of the preceding two Plenary Sessions at least sixty
>(60) days prior to the
>next Plenary Session and further; invite and collect comments for
>presentation to the Executive
>can not be adhered to because we do not have an infrastructure to do so.
>(stds-802-all is an on request list only)
>The best alternative for me was to sent the proposal to the reflectors of
>.1, .3, .11, .15 and .16 with a request for comments to be sent to me and
>the individual's WG Chair. (Sorry Mike, I missed .17, but copied .0, so I do
>hope you made a forward)
>In having done so, the following requirement:
>"Concurrent with distribution to the LMSC members, an Executive Committee
>letter ballot shall
>I respectfully request that you allow the deviation because I could present
>in the ballot a summary of comments form the constituency.
>Agere Systems Nederland B.V., formerly Lucent Technologies
>3431 JZ Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
>Phone: +31 30 609 7528 (Time Zone UTC + 1)
>FAX: +31 30 609 7498