Re: [802SEC] Explanation regarding the Rules change motions
At 14:24 24/01/2002 +0200, Roger B. Marks wrote:
>The rules change procedure has been satisfied to my satisfaction.
>At 11:52 AM +0000 02/01/24, Hayes, Vic (Vic) wrote:
> >I have to apologize for an omission on my part in the process for rules
> >change and ask that you nevertheless participate and allow the continuation
> >of the process.
> >To my great concern, Paul Nikolich drew my attention to the fact that the
> >required 60 days before the Plenary meeting was already passed before I send
> >out the ballots.
> >To my defense, I can only give you the fact that I was distracted and
> >concerned that the requirement in our rules:
> >"shall distribute the proposed change to all persons who have attended the
> >Plenary Session or one of the preceding two Plenary Sessions at least sixty
> >(60) days prior to the
> >next Plenary Session and further; invite and collect comments for
> >presentation to the Executive
> >can not be adhered to because we do not have an infrastructure to do so.
> >(stds-802-all is an on request list only)
> >The best alternative for me was to sent the proposal to the reflectors of
> >.1, .3, .11, .15 and .16 with a request for comments to be sent to me and
> >the individual's WG Chair. (Sorry Mike, I missed .17, but copied .0, so I do
> >hope you made a forward)
> >In having done so, the following requirement:
> >"Concurrent with distribution to the LMSC members, an Executive Committee
> >letter ballot shall
> >be conducted,"
> >I respectfully request that you allow the deviation because I could present
> >in the ballot a summary of comments form the constituency.
> >Vic Hayes
> >Agere Systems Nederland B.V., formerly Lucent Technologies
> >Zadelstede 1-10
> >3431 JZ Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
> >Phone: +31 30 609 7528 (Time Zone UTC + 1)
> >FAX: +31 30 609 7498
> >e-mail: email@example.com