Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] +++SEC Ballot: Rules change for SEC SC+++


I vote Disapprove. My comments were part of the comment attachment 
that you distributed with the ballot.

Furthermore, I am not convinced that we need such a radical rules 
change to solve any problems of which I am aware. The recent major 
changes to Procedures 3
and 4 have given us a simplified and practical solution to the 
problem of external communications. If other issues remain, I'd 
prefer that we make use of the TAG concept, or propose revisions to 
it as necessary.


>Dear SEC,
>Per the motion passed at the November 2001 meeting, attached you will find
>the proposal for the IEEE 802 Rules change to introduce an SEC Standing
>Committee for e-mail ballot. In addition, you will find the collection of
>comments received to a call for comments from the .1, .3, .11, .15 and .16
>The ballot opened January 24, 8 AM EDT and closes February 10 5pm EDT. As
>the SEC appointed me as the driver of the rules change, I respectfully
>request that you send your vote to me.
>  <<RR-01-028r1_Proposed_Rules_Change_for_SEC_Standing_Committees.doc>> 
>Vic Hayes
>Agere Systems Nederland B.V., formerly Lucent Technologies
>Zadelstede 1-10
>3431 JZ  Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
>Phone: +31 30 609 7528 (Time Zone UTC + 1)
>FAX: +31 30 609 7498
>Attachment converted: TiDrive:RR-01-028r1_Proposed_Rules_Chan 
>(WDBN/MSWD) (000B2AE1)
>Attachment converted: TiDrive:RR-02-010r0_Comments-on-SEC-SC. 
>(WDBN/MSWD) (000B2AE2)