|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
Thanks for pulling together. The suggested resolution works for me.
Attached are revised slides that have been submitted by Joanne Wilson of ArrayComm to clarify the status of iBurst vis-à-vis work ongoing in 802.20. Joanne has agreed to change slide 16 and in addition slide 24 to take care of Buzz's concern. The changed slides are attached. The text item in slide 16 now reads: Proven technology, standards-based IP networking support, multiple large manufacturers.
The last item on slide 24 now reads : Real world experience supports future submission to IEEE802.20
Joanne had asked for both my and Carl's concurrence. Unfortunately Carl has been unavailable so since the CITEL report is due tomorrow I have asked Joanne to submit this NOW so the corrected version can be attached.
Attached are my proposed modifications to the presentation to resolve any concerns about
possible misinterpretations that could be taken about ArrayComm's technology and it
relationship to the work in IEEE 802.20. Please confirm that you find these acceptable
and I will then submit them to the CITEL secretariat.
Thanks for your assistance in resolving this matter.