Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

RE: [802SEC] LMSC deadbeats

Works for me, unless IEEE legal determines that
there could be some liability in doing so.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bill Quackenbush []
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 3:11 PM
> To: IEEE 802 SEC
> Cc: Dawn C. Slykhouse; Jennifer Hull
> Subject: [802SEC] LMSC deadbeats
> Gentle people,
> There were about a dozen "unpaid attendees" at the July 
> plenary session
> in SF.  All of them have been contacted and about half of them have
> still not paid up.
> The amount of effort required to contact these individuals first by
> email and then with several increasingly stern letters is significant
> and in my opinion not worth the effort.
> Therefore I propose to introduce the policy that "unpaid attendees" of
> an LMSC session that have been contacted by email and that 
> have neither
> pay up by the deadline stated in the P&P nor been determined 
> to have not
> attended any portion of a LMSC technical meeting that was scheduled as
> part of the plenary session be publicly identified, along with their
> corporate affiliation, at the LMSC EC meeting and the LMSC plenary
> meeting on Monday morning.  Each such individual will be notified by
> email that this identification will occur.
> Does anyone have a problem with such a policy?
> Thanks,
> wlq