[802SEC] Avoiding Appeal Pain in the Future
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: [802SEC] Avoiding Appeal Pain in the Future
- From: Mike Takefman <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:51:10 -0500
- References: <9E3BA3946476AD4EB94672712B12A85FB32337@ftmail.lab.flarion.com>
- Sender: firstname.lastname@example.org
- User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020823
Dear EC Members,
At the January meeting I agreed to write an email to
start discussion on the issue of elections in dot20.
The goal of this email is to be proactive so that
we have a high probability of avoiding a surge of
appeals following the March meeting.
At our EC meeting in March 2003 and at subsequent
meetings the following issues have been raised.
0) That an organization is attempting to dominate the WG.
1) To further that end, many companies sent a large number of
2) A large number of consultants were sent to the March'03
meeting to bolster the position of their sponsors, and the
relationship between those consulting firms and their
sponsors was not declared as per ANSI rules.
3) Double sign-in of voters from another other WG for the
purpose of gaining initial membership in order to vote
at the initial meeting.
Given the secret nature of the last election, there is no
ability to analyse the results to prove that there was
no attempt to dominate.
Given my experience in dot17 with block voting behavior
I present the following steps to restore confidence in
the election process are as follows:
a) All members must declare what company is sponsoring their
attendance. As per ANSI rules, consultants shall declare who
their sponsor is, or declare if their sponsor is already
represented as a voter. Any consultants whose details are
found to be incorrect shall not have their vote counted.
b) The members who signed into multiple groups for the March'03
session should be subjected to the following checks and those that
do not show clear interest and attendance in dot20 should be
i) What do they claim their interest was for that week.
ii) Where possible, verify if their claimed interest is what was
marked in their registration.
iii) Verify their attendance at subsequent dot20 meetings and
if possible determine if they continue to do double
c) The election shall be conducted as a role call vote and then
the results must be analyzed to prove existence of domination.
Howard Frazier had suggested that a sub-committee be formed
(with for example the treasurer & secretary) as members to
resolve the issue of valid voters (b).
I further suggest, that a sub-committee be formed to
do the analysis of the election ballots.
I encourage Jerry to come back with his plan for insuring an
election that withstands scrutiny and appeal.