RE: [802SEC] IEEE-SA CAG considering sponsoring competing standards to IEEE 802
You are correct - it was suppose to be "I do not think"
Pat
-----Original Message-----
From: Geoff Thompson [mailto:gthompso@nortelnetworks.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 6:31 PM
To: THALER,PAT (A-Roseville,ex1)
Cc: carlstevenson@agere.com; r.b.marks@ieee.org; bob.grow@intel.com;
stds-802-sec@ieee.org
Subject: RE: [802SEC] IEEE-SA CAG considering sponsoring competing
standards to IEEE 802
Pat-
Is what you typed what you meant?
You think that the (immature and untested) CAG should be able to force its
will on the established process?
I would guess that meant to type a "not" in there.
At 07:20 PM 2/12/2004 -0700, pat_thaler@agilent.com wrote:
>However, I do think an ability of the CAG to force entity voting by
>writing a PAR is appropriate or correct.
Geoff