Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] Socials



Title: Message
All,
I have to agree with Geoff about a Sunday night social.
 
While the event can be a bit large (and noisy) it also provides a break from the meetings to not only "meet and great" but to meet and move off to other places for more detailed discussions. In that way it is useful to stop the formal meetings and allow more ad hoc discussions take place, either in the social or simply begin there.
 
Regards,
Mike
 
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@listserv.ieee.org [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Thompson, Geoff [SC100:321:EXCH]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 18:25
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [802SEC] Socials

Mat-

I fear that moving the social to Sunday night would:
- be terrible for participation, many don't arrive until Monday noon.
- appear to be self-serving for the Exec ("others don't have to be here on Sunday").
- put many trip authorizing managers in the awkward position of explicitly having to authorize ~$200 incremental expense to have their employees (i.e. another hotel night) to attend a party.
- put those who have the opportunity to travel Monday AM in the position of choosing between family Sunday or 802 party (I would hope family wins).

I think that the result would be even lower participation. That would create a large faction that would be positioned to say that 10% of their meeting fees was going to an activity that their management doesn't support (by not sending them on Sunday). then the funding would disappear and the social would be completely gone.

Geoff


At 03:52 PM 11/19/2004 -0800, Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA) wrote:

Pat,

An alternative I've raised is the possibility to moving the Social to
Sunday Night as a meet and greet.  We can couple it with an introduction
to 802 session.  Also, since most of us are here on Sunday anyway, we
can move the opening EC meetings to Sunday.  I'm moving ballot
resolution to telecom so that should make some room.

Just some ideas.

Mat

Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Senior Member Technical Staff
BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
Office: +1 973.633.6344
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-stds-802-sec@listserv.ieee.org
[mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@listserv.ieee.org] On Behalf Of Pat Thaler
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 6:30 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [802SEC] Socials

I think we should put the question raised by 802.11 of whether to
continue having socials to our working groups at the next plenary. On
the one hand, I hate to get rid of the opportunity to meet each other in
a less formal setting than our meetings. On the other hand, as we get
larger it isn't clear that socials are working.

It is becoming increasingly difficult to locate people in these large
gatherings.

The noise level is often so high that conversation is difficult - a
positive feedback loop that results in a hoarse throat.

Because of these factors I know some people don't choose to attend the
social.

The cost seems much higher than the benefit they are providing - over
$30 a head at the last plenary.

Regards,
Pat

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.

----------
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.  This list is maintained by Listserv.
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.