Re: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ WG Voting Rules +++ Propos

Thread Links	Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Folks,

We had a comment resolution session tonight (poorly attended but productive). We agreed that the quorum issue should be moved to the upcoming WG Membership and Meetings ballot and decided jointly with the membership roll off issue. I have rolled out the 33% quorum changed, and the resulting text is attached. I believe this revision should now carry. If you still plan to vote against it (or not vote / abstain) please let me know.

Thanks,

Mat

Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.
Senior Member Technical Staff
BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR
Office: +1 973.633.6344
email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com

From: owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG [mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Sherman, Matthew J. (US SSA)
Sent: Monday, March 14, 2005 2:42 PM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ WG Voting Rules +++ Proposed Resoution Status

Folks,

A Straw poll on this P&P revision ballot had the following result:

For: 1

Against: 9

Abstain: 2

Did Not Vote: 3

Discussions following the vote indicted the key point of contention was quorum requirements during interims. No clear consensus exists on this topic, and an addition comment resolution session has been scheduled for:

Date: Tuesday 3/15/05

Time: 9:30-10:30 PM

Place: Room 226 Atrium Tower, 2^nd Floor (executive conference room)

One comment made was that the quorum issue cannot be solved unless we also address the membership aging issue, and that the two are coupled. We will have a ballot on WG Membership and Meetings kicked off this session that will attempt to address the aging issue. Right now my thought is to leave the interim quorum requirement as is (50%) but add the issue of interim quorum requirements to the WG Membership and Meetings P&P Revisions so that it may be addressed together with membership aging. Hopefully this will address the question for the current ballot

I still plan to hold the a meeting on this ballot to make sure consensus exists for the rest of the ballot. Upon addressing that issue, if people have any other issue relating to the current ballots I invite them to bring those issues forward.

Thanks,

Mat

Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.

Senior Member Technical Staff

BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR

Office: +1 973.633.6344

email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com

Re: [802SEC] +++ LMSC P&P Revision Ballot +++ WG Voting Rules +++ Proposed Resoution Status