RE: UPAMD goals - life expectancy
If I am reading this right, you agreeing with 10 year life meaning "to
become obsolete".
I don't think we should try to spec 10 years life "as until breaks"
because it will make Conformity Verification a nightmare.
-----Original Message-----
From: upamd@xxxxxxxx [mailto:upamd@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Leonard_Tsai@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 10:04 AM
To: pkar@xxxxxxxx; upamd@xxxxxxxx
Subject: UPAMD goals - life expectancy
I don't think we should define MTBF; this is up to each manufacturer to
spec.
I think the original idea is that the standard requires a new affirm
every 5 years and we should expect that it last for at least 2 renewal
with major changes so much that it gets obsolete.
-----Original Message-----
From: upamd@xxxxxxxx [mailto:upamd@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Piotr Karocki
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2010 3:48 AM
To: upamd@xxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: UPAMD updated goals
> a. Life expectancy of 10 years, hopefully more
Yes.
Maybe one question - "life expectancy" as MTBF, or as "to become
obsolete"?
========================================================================
=======================================
This message may contain information which is private, privileged or
confidential of Compal Electronics, Inc.
If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please notify the
sender and destroy/delete the message.
Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of
any action in reliance upon this information, by persons or entities
other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
========================================================================
=======================================