Re: UPAMD Working Group Meeting for 14 February 2012

[Mark Anderson <emer@xxxxxxxx>]

Silent was on my list as well.
Mark

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Bruce Nordman <bnordman@xxxxxxx> wrote:

"Mute" seems like a good candidate.
I can't think of a word other than "non-communicating" which
implies both lack of speech and lack of listening.
I would also offer for consideration "Silent".
--Bruce

On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:43 AM, Alex Schneider <aschneiderjr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I believe a non-communicating device should be described as “mute”.

 

Alex Schneider

 

---

From: upamd@xxxxxxxx [mailto:upamd@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob Davis
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 11:22 PM
To: upamd@xxxxxxxx; 'George Riley'
Cc: 'Yurtin, John'
Subject: UPAMD Working Group Meeting for 14 February 2012

 

UPAMD Working Group

 

For tomorrow’s meeting.  Please consider a name for use for the current Dumb devices.  These are now Dumb and non-communicating devices.  A better name is sought.  It should show that they are not regular devices and at the bottom of the priority queue.   I would like to take a poll on the device names we discuss at the meeting.  Feel free to offer suggestions.

 

I...

--
Bruce Nordman
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
eetd.lbl.gov/ea/nordman
BNordman@xxxxxxx
510-486-7089
m: 510-501-7943