| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Alex, Thanks. The 0.588 was to be equal to the Mill-Max spec of 120gram. The others I did round up some which is why the 8.1 N(825 grams) internal mated force was reset to 8.22 N. The number had to add up. The references to 11.7 and 12.1 are logical and I will look at that text more closely. Bob From: upamd@xxxxxxxx [mailto:upamd@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Schneider, Alex Bob, Thank you for turning around such a polished revision so quickly. I have reviewed the revisions incorporated at last night’s meeting and offer the following comments. Section 11.4.1 You did an excellent job of minimizing our exposure to accusations of “commercialism” with regard to the Mill-Max pins. Section 11.4.2 and subsequent. Values in grams to one or two significant figures (60 and 75) have been rendered considerably more precise by conversion to Newtons. (0.588, 0.74 respectively). I suggest that 0.6 N and 0.75 N are sufficiently precise. The same comment applies to Table 11-1 and to material below Table 12-3 on page 99. Section 11.7. I had previously suggested deletion of several words, which was done, but also deletion of “that” from the second and third sentences. The word “that” converts the rest of the sentences to subordinate clauses modifying the subject, “position”, but there then is no verb in the sentence. When “that” is removed, “will support” and “will firmly attach” become future tense verbs and we have complete sentences. On the line immediately below Figure 12-1, we have the following sentence. “Other possible cable constructions for this speciation has been designed that is functionally equivalent.” The subject “constructions” is plural, so the verb must be as well. The sentence should read “Other possible cable constructions for this speciation have been designed that are functionally equivalent.” Alex From: upamd@xxxxxxxx [mailto:upamd@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob Davis UPAMD, There is a marked up pdf version of the UPAMD Draft standard available on the website. The updated comment file is also there. See http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/msc/upamd/private/UPAMDDrafts/UPAMD_P1823Draft_201209190900markup.pdf One set of changes are still coming from Mark. I hope to complete this today. Respectfully; Bob Davis Summit Computer Systems, Inc. 408.353.5990 desk 408.857.1273 cell |