Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Motion P1788/M0021.01:IntervalOverlapping discussion period begins



P-1788,

Since the motion has been put forward by Juergen Wolff von Gudenberg and seconded
by Nate Hayes, it will now be discussed and put to a vote according to
the rules for position papers.  The discussion will continue until September 24.

Juergen:  Thank you for already posting this information, as well as the
          position paper, to the P1788 site at

          http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1788/private/Motions/AllMotions.html

(Anyone who needs the password to that web area should contact me.)

William:  Please record this action in the minutes.

Baker

On 9/3/2010 09:38, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:
Juergen,

Thank you for proffering the motion. Do I have a second?

Baker

On 9/3/2010 9:28 AM, Jürgen Wolff von Gudenberg wrote:
Baker
Yes such a function is necessary
Let me rephrase the motion tomake it clearer (hopefully)

Motion 21
"P1788 should provide access to the states of the interval overlapping
relation. In particular it should provide a function on two intervals a and b whose range is the set of 13 states defined by tables 1 and 2.
Additionally the functionality of the abstract data type IOV described by table 8 in section 5 of the position paper should be available.
For full flexibility the atomic operations shall be available as comparisons, see Table 9."

Juergen

Am 02.09.2010 19:22, schrieb R. Baker Kearfott:
Juergen (et al),

Before I ask for a second, can you please clarify what P1788
is being asked to provide. In particular, is it being asked
to provide a function on two intervals a and b whose range is
precisely the set of 13 stated defined by tables 1 and 2?
Yes such a function is necessary


Baker

On 9/1/2010 9:21 AM, Jürgen Wolff von Gudenberg wrote:
P1788
we have updated our position paper

Interval Comparisons and Lattice Operations
based on the Interval Overlapping Relation

see http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1788/PositionPapers/overlapping.pdf
or attachement

based on that paper I move the following motion
"P1788 should provide access to the states of the interval overlapping
>> relation"

This motion is to be understood as a supplement to motion 13.04.
The advantages are outlined in the position paper that serves as
rationale for the motion.

Juergen







--

---------------------------------------------------------------
R. Baker Kearfott,    rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work)                     (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------