Re: Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- discussion perios begins
> From: "Nate Hayes" <nh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "Dan Zuras Intervals" <intervals08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "John Pryce" <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- discussion perios begins
> Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:44:58 -0500
>
>
>
> Ok, folks. That all sounds good to me.
>
> Attached then, is my formal submission for an amendment to Motion 22.
>
> I think John has done a fine job on the motion and am only proposing an
> amendment to change that P1788 standardize "defined and continuous" as the
> official "public interface" of this decoration bit as opposed to
> "discontinuous".
>
> My reasons why I think this would be best for P1788 are also explained in
> the paper.
>
> Sincerley,
>
> Nate Hayes
>
And in the spirit of formality,
I formally second this amendment. - Dan