Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- discussion perios begins

Can someone help me at this point? If John concurs, can this be counted
as a friendly amendment, and we continue the discussion on the
amended motion without resetting the clock?

Baker

On 9/12/2010 19:53, Dan Zuras Intervals wrote:

From: "Nate Hayes"<nh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To:<rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
	"Dan Zuras Intervals"<intervals08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "John Pryce"<j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
	<stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- discussion perios begins
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 19:44:58 -0500



Ok, folks. That all sounds good to me.

Attached then, is my formal submission for an amendment to Motion 22.

I think John has done a fine job on the motion and am only proposing an
amendment to change that P1788 standardize "defined and continuous" as the
official "public interface" of this decoration bit as opposed to
"discontinuous".

My reasons why I think this would be best for P1788 are also explained in
the paper.

Sincerley,

Nate Hayes



	And in the spirit of formality,
	I formally second this amendment.  - Dan




--

---------------------------------------------------------------
R. Baker Kearfott,    rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work)                     (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------