Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Four vs. five decorations



Nate Hayes a écrit :
Dominique Lohez wrote:
Nate Hayes a écrit :
so for the sake of keeping discussion focused, I attach a PDF
addressing my thoughts only on the first of these two issues. I'll give
examples later addressing the topic of bare decorations.

IMHO the touble with set operators lies that as noted their behavior
depends on extra information.
So the position of Arnold Neumaier may be valid if the stated conditions
hold.

???
Your example works very nicely at level 1 and lower level because the vale are small integers and rational numbers with denominator which are power of 2 . Replace 2 by 3 and a lot of problems arises: You have to use partial interval overlapping other the piecewise defined function may be undefined.



Suppose that you work with the Dan Zuras' potential well functions with a > 0

potential (x) = sqrt(x² -a)  if       |x| >= sqrt(a)
                       -sqrt(a-x^2 )    if |x |  <=  sqrt(a)

To keep the function defined in the interval of use the function have to be modified in contradictory in the various intervals

The approximate function of the initially continuous function may become not continuous.

The problem is really difficult.  Even a cautious programmer  may fail.

Thus the program  must never lie
It must never believe the programmer implicit extra-assertions and check from known data and decorations

Dominique




--
Dr Dominique LOHEZ
ISEN
41, Bd Vauban
F59046 LILLE
France

Phone : +33 (0)3 20 30 40 71
Email: Dominique.Lohez@xxxxxxx





--
Dr Dominique LOHEZ
ISEN
41, Bd Vauban
F59046 LILLE
France

Phone : +33 (0)3 20 30 40 71
Email: Dominique.Lohez@xxxxxxx