Is there a second? Re: Unification of motion 25 and 27
P-1788,
Is there a second to this friendly amendment?
If so, we will continue with the same discussion period, unless I receive
objections.
Baker
On 7/10/2011 1:00 PM, Jürgen Wolff von Gudenberg wrote:
Baker,
Nate, Marco and myself have unified motions 25 and 27.
We want to submit the result as Amendment of motion 27, motion 25 will be withdrawn.
27A provides 4 (or 5) decorations in one linear order, comparisons are independent from decorations, the most pessimistic decoration propagates.
The paragraph on bare decorations has been taken out, it will be subject of a future motion.
We suggest that the discussion period until July 26 should NOT be prolonged.
The amendment is attached. Since Nate is now co-author I think we need a new seconder.
I have taken the liberty to change the website already
sincerely yours
Juergen
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------