Re: Is there a second? Re: Unification of motion 25 and 27

[Dominique Lohez <dominique.lohez@xxxxxxx>]

Ralph Baker Kearfott a écrit :
> P-1788,
>
> Is there a second to this friendly amendment?
I second this friendly amendment

Dominique LOHEZ
> If so, we will continue with the same discussion period, unless I receive
> objections.
>
> Baker
>
> On 7/10/2011 1:00 PM, Jürgen Wolff von Gudenberg wrote:
> > Baker,
> > Nate, Marco and myself have unified motions 25 and 27.
> > We want to submit the result as Amendment of motion 27, motion 25 
> > will be withdrawn.
> > 27A provides 4 (or 5) decorations in one linear order, comparisons 
> > are independent from decorations, the most pessimistic decoration 
> > propagates.
> > The paragraph on bare decorations has been taken out, it will be 
> > subject of a future motion.
> > We suggest that the discussion period until July 26 should NOT be 
> > prolonged.
> > The amendment is attached. Since Nate is now co-author I think we 
> > need a new seconder.
> > I have taken the liberty to change the website already
> >
> > sincerely yours
> > Juergen


--
Dr Dominique LOHEZ
ISEN
41, Bd Vauban
F59046 LILLE
France

Phone : +33 (0)3 20 30 40 71
Email: Dominique.Lohez@xxxxxxx