Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
P-1788: Since Motion 35 has been made by Nate Hayes and seconded by Svetoslav Markov, the discussion period now begins, and will end after Saturday, May 26, 2012. I append the motion, and I attach the corresponding paper giving the rationale. Discussion on this motion will proceed according to the rules for position papers. Juergen: Please place the motion and associated information in the appropriate place on the web page, as you have aptly done in the past. Acting secretary: Please record the transaction in the minutes. As usual, please contact me if you need the password to the private area of the P-1788 web site. Best regards, Baker (acting as chair, P-1788) On 05/03/2012 07:00 PM, Nate Hayes wrote:
As described in the accompanying position paper, P1788 shall change the existing Level 1 and Level 2 model to the three-tiered level structure as described in Section 2. Specifically, this means the following: -- The "mathematical intervals" at Level 1 are defined to be the classic set of nonempty, closed and bounded intervals; this is the level of "mathematical regularity" (MR) for interval arithmetic. The FTIA, infimum, supremum, midpoint and radius are all defined as in Section 2.1. -- In Level 1a, FTIA is extended to unbounded intervals and the empty set according to (4) and (5); this is the level of "algebraic closure" (AC) for interval arithmetic. More specifically, an unbounded interval is interpreted as a family of intervals parameterized (virtually) by an overflow threshold, as defined and explained in Section 2.2. -- Level 2 is defined as in Section 2.3; this is the level of "interval datums." The maximal real element of each interval datum format defines the concrete value of each corresponding overflow threshold at Level 1a. -- All of the "infinities" in the current model are changed to "overflow", i.e., lower-case omega. -- The midpoint operation is defined at Level 1a and Level 2 for all nonempty intervals as a real number (we suggest something similar to what is discussed in Section 3.2, but we leave the actual definition for a future motion); the midpoint of an empty interval is left to a future motion. -------------------------------------------
-- --------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax) (337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home) URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette (Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street) Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA ---------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
overflow.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document