Re: Motion on interval flavors
(This is a resend of a post made on Monday July 9th -- had gateway
problems again where my outgoing mail silently went to the bitbucket.)
One point has not been addressed in the various analogies that have been
presented in this thread: the difference between including something in
a standard, and preventing use because it would lead to non-conformance.
Adding complex number support to an implementation will not invalidate its
conformance to 754.
What motion 36 is trying to do it giving Kaucher intervals the same courtesy.
Michel.
---Sent: 2012-07-12 18:28:01 UTC