comments on flavors
John, p1788
after reading the flavor proposal carefully I still am not shure what
will be its consequences. some comments, suggestions, questions. Let me
start with 4 provocative postulates
1. the classical or common intervals are a flavor !
will it be sufficient to only provide these ?
2. the set-based flavor is required !
this is the result of our work.
3. the Kaucher flavor is optional
4. the cset flavor is not necessary
my answers
1: yes but not sufficient
2. yes
3. if the kaucher subgroup will be ready in time, I would like to
include it
4. i see no applications
Sorry but I still think we should keep our number of flavors as small as
possible.
Now some comments to the draft text
2.1 2nd paragraph line 2 "is a set of reals" add "connected"
2.1 3rd para delete the last sentence
2.1 6th para change "more accesible" by "always accessible"
2.1 last 2 paras delete quotations of cset model
5.1 If we decide to make classical a flavor, a table of operations
belongs to this section
5.5 the decoration "com"
in the set-based flavor we have the decoration"dac" what means defined
and continuous. together with information on overflow we have "com"
Juergen
--
o Prof. Dr. Juergen Wolff von Gudenberg, Lehrstuhl fuer
Informatik II
/ \ Universitaet Wuerzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Wuerzburg
InfoII o Tel.: +49 931 / 31 86602
/ \ Uni E-Mail: wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
o o Wuerzburg