Wait a moment... Motion 39 was for the following text:
**File: 20121110P1788Clause1.pdf (revised Nov 13)
The new text
**File: 20121130Clauses1-2forVote.pdf
is rather new and substantially augmented; and discussion thereof
has only just started!
Perhaps you meant to say that the Motion 39 vote is restricted to
clauses 1.1 through 1.6, excluding the new 1.7 and 1.8 -- never mind
clauses 2.x for which John requested a new motion on Nov 30. (John
also requested a motion for clauses 8.8.x, The Decoration System, on
Dec 1st.)
Btw, seeing that no Second has been offered yet, I formally second
the motion on Clause 2 (presumably M40) and the motion on Clause 8.8
(presumably M41).
I see that one substantial comment I made on Clauses1&2 (about 1.1)
could
have been made earlier, as the same text occurs in the Nov 11 text that
had been submitted for M39 -- unfortunately I was distracted by other
matters (such as reconstructing my mail file). It is however a show
stopper for me, so if voting does start now, I'll have to say No (and
will formally propose the alternate wording I had suggested yesterday).
Michel.
---Sent: 2012-12-02 21:58:31 UTC