Re: -0 and +0
Vincent,
Yes. However, deadlines are rapidly closing in on us, so we
should consider production of a meaningful standard containing
levels 1 and 2.
Best regards,
Baker
On 04/25/2013 12:44 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2013-04-25 08:51:52 -0500, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:
On 04/25/2013 08:08 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
This is at Level 1 and Level 2. Representation (Level 3) is another
matter, where you can't ignore that a number format may have signed
zeros...
and we may possibly not specify that much at level 3. Isn't
level 3 still up in the air, anyway?
I don't think we are ready to specify Level 3. The biggest risk is
to do that wrong, without an implementation. Informative text could
be useful, though.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------