Re: -0 and +0
On 2013-04-25 14:23:20 -0500, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:
> Michel:
>
> Again, YES: See Motion 29 --- Level 3 interface only -- it passed
> UNANIMOUSLY on January 7, 2012, with 47 'yes', 0 'no.' There
> is no need to revisit it.
Motion 29 says:
| 1c. An _interchange type shall be defined at the bit level, for
| _available_ or _supported_ 754-conforming interval types.
So, there's the question of the encoding of the zero endpoints...
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)