| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Siegfried, Thank you for pointing this out. We will look this up. We apologize for overlooking this, if you had pointed this out to us before. Baker On 11/30/2013 10:37 AM, Siegfried M. Rump wrote:
Am 26.11.2013, 02:48 Uhr, schrieb Vincent Lefevre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx>:However I'm rather worried that there are no reference implementations yet, and when one becomes ready, there will not be much time to test it. So, this increases the risk to have a bad standard.I pointed out several times that IMHO there is a severe problem with infinity in the proposed standard. Then I wrote a paper solving this, offering other advantages as well: S.M. Rump. Interval Arithmetic Over Finitely Many Endpoints. BIT Numerical Mathematics, 52(4):1059–1075, 2012. The only comment I heard from the stds-1788 mail group was that there is no reference implementation. What a strange logic. Best wishes, Siegfried M. Rump
-- --------------------------------------------------------------- R. Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax) (337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home) URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette (Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street) Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA ---------------------------------------------------------------