Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Did I get a a second? Re: Bill's new motion

P-1788,

So far, I have not seen a second to this motion.
Is that correct, or have I missed something?

Baker



On 11/26/13 7:06 AM, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:

P-1788,

Do I have a second to this motion (appended, in Bill's
email)?


Baker

P.S. This might be a topic of discussion, if this motion
     is seconded, but I am wondering if the terms
     "mathematically consistent" and "containment constraint"
     would need to be made more precise.

On 11/25/2013 04:35 PM, G. William (Bill) Walster wrote:
.
.
.


Section 7 should state that in addition of any flavors described in the
standard, without restrictions, any mathematically consistent interval
system with a containment constraint and published in "Mathematics of
Computation" will also be a valid flavor in the standard.


.
.
.








--

---------------------------------------------------------------
R. Baker Kearfott,    rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work)                     (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------