Re: Relation between P1788 and P1788.1
On 2014-12-01 21:59:55 -0600, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:
> It is meant by its champion (Ned Nedialkov) to be C):
> 1788.1 is meant to be a proper subset of the 1788 set-based flavor.
> A P1788.1-conforming program is meant to be 1788-conforming, but not
> visa versa.
I don't think so. A P1788.1-conforming program may depend on features
that are out of scope of P1788.1, which may prevent the program from
being 1788-conforming.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)