Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Relation between P1788 and P1788.1

Vincent,

Can you explain?

Baker

On 12/04/2014 09:03 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:

On 2014-12-01 21:59:55 -0600, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:

It is meant by its champion (Ned Nedialkov) to be C):
1788.1 is meant to be a proper subset of the 1788 set-based flavor.
A P1788.1-conforming program is meant to be 1788-conforming, but not
visa versa.


I don't think so. A P1788.1-conforming program may depend on features
that are out of scope of P1788.1, which may prevent the program from
being 1788-conforming.




--

---------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Baker Kearfott,   rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work)                     (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------