Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: IEEEP1788



On 2015-04-24 12:37:53 +0200, Ulrich Kulisch wrote:
> But let me remind you that I am the one who claims that IEEE 754 is not
> needed for the development of IEEE P1788. Its frequent citation there is at
> least an irritation of the reader. The text for the standard should be kept
> as simple as possible.

IEEE 754 is optional. If you don't like it, ignore it.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)