Re: Proposed disposition of comments
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 11:45:05 -0500, Baker wrote:
> Speaking informally, I am wondering if there is any real controversy
> here. IMO the clean fix would be to simply replace the first paragraph
> of 8.3 by "A flavor shall provide the decoration com, with the following
> propagation rule for library arithmetic operations."
>
> Reading the rules for submission to REVCOM, I note the Sponsor can submit
> the draft to REVCOM (before April 24 for the June REVCOM meeting) WHILE a
> recirculation is in progress, provided the 75% approval has already been
> achieved. Perhaps the easy thing to do would be to have another
> recirculation in progress while the materials are submitted to REVCOM.
In the 2nd recirculation draft, P1788_MAIN-D9p7,pdf, the 1st paragraph
of 8.3 still says "A flavor may provide the decoration com...".
So what has changed since the 1st recirculation?
I'll also remind you of what I wrote in reply, also on April 16:
| It occurred to me that there may be another way out of the "com"-required
| discrepancy: Say that "com" always exists at Level 1!
This elicited no comments.
Michel.
---Sent: 2015-04-29 14:16:12 UTC