Hi Chaoming,
Thank you for your suggestion.
Please see Mike’s suggestion on this topic. The text “While maintaining an association to an SMD-ME …
” at the start of the sentence will confine the ‘past’ context only to be within the ‘current’ SMD-ME association. Would you be fine with Mike’s suggested text?
Regards,
Abhi
From:
罗朝明(Chaoming Luo) <luochaoming@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 7, 2025 8:10 PM
To: Abhishek Patil <appatil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Roaming TTT]: Please review proposed resolution for 6147
WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
Hi Abhi,
Would
“in the past” be too broad? 1 day in the past, 1 year in the past? What if the existing SMD_KDK is derived in a different SMD?
Maybe add some restriction to the SMD_KDK helps: the new Per-AP MLD PTK is derived using the existing SMD_KDK
cached for that SMD-ME as described in the previous paragraph
BR,
Chaoming
发件人:
Abhishek Patil <0000297b717f2a04-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
发送时间: 2025年11月8日 10:28
收件人: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] [Roaming TTT]: Please review proposed resolution for 6147
Hi TTT members for roaming,
Thomas and I discussed and came up with the following text as resolution for CID 6147. Could you please review and let us know if you have any suggestions for the proposed text:
|
6147 |
Chien-Fang Hsu |
37.16.5.4 |
245.40 |
the definition of "initial AP MLD" is not clear. |
define the initial AP MLD as the AP MLD that the non-AP MLD performs initial association to the SMD-ME |
Regards,
Abhi
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1