|Thread Links||Date Links|
|Thread Prev||Thread Next||Thread Index||Date Prev||Date Next||Date Index|
I would like to add a couple things to Bob Love's email on review of T&D
What is most essential when reviewing the T&D resolutions is that
terminology and associated definitions are consistent with intended usage
in the standard. While it's true that we can't have perfect closure
on terminology until we complete the rest of the document, the intent is to try
to identify vocabularly that will help drive consistency in
composing the standard. If you see terminology or definitions that really
strike you the wrong way please let us know.
I would rather see objections stemming from intended
usage rather than knit-picky "I don't quite like the wording of this
definition". In the end, terms which are not actually part of the document
will be dropped, and terminology will be revised as content and usage
within the standard becomes clearer.
To those who are either writing, editing, or reviewing
one of the various proposed drafts, I would hope to see adoption
of T&D terms in the proposed drafts or pointing out the required changes.
Bob Sultan and I have already put together a list of terms which we believe
have relevance and usage in the standard and warrant discussion
within the working group. We may even solicit straw polls
to get majority opinion regarding these definitions.
Please take a look at bs_TDIS_01.pdf regarding these terms
and associated considerations as well as the updated T&D section
for the latest definitions. The list is also open, so any resolution
objections we receive shall be added to the list.
Jedai Broadband Networks
(732) 758-9900 x236