| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
802.17 WG,
I would like to add a couple things to Bob Love's email
on review of T&D
resolutions.
What is most essential when reviewing the T&D
resolutions is that
terminology and associated definitions are consistent
with intended usage
in the standard. While it's true that we can't
have perfect closure
on terminology until we complete the rest of the
document, the intent is to try
to identify vocabularly that will help drive
consistency in
composing the standard. If you see
terminology or definitions that really
strike you the wrong way please let us
know.
I would rather see objections stemming from
intended
usage rather than knit-picky "I
don't quite like the wording of this
definition". In the end, terms which are not
actually part of the document
will be dropped, and terminology will be
revised as content and usage
within the standard becomes
clearer.
To those who are either writing, editing, or
reviewing
one of the various proposed drafts, I would hope
to see adoption
of T&D terms in the proposed drafts or
pointing out the required changes.
Bob Sultan and I have already put together a list of
terms which we believe
have relevance and usage in the standard and warrant
discussion
within the working group. We may even solicit
straw polls
to get majority opinion regarding these
definitions.
Please take a look at bs_TDIS_01.pdf regarding these
terms
and associated considerations as well as the updated
T&D section
for the latest definitions. The list is also
open, so any resolution
objections we receive shall be added to the
list.
thanks,
bob
Robert
Castellano
Jedai Broadband
Networks
(732) 758-9900
x236
|