Re: [802SEC] P802.3at PAR and Five Criteria (Residential Ethernet)
I do the same and reference the SEC archive for my WG mailing rather
than resend the bits.
I probably should have apologized for filling YOUR email boxes with the
extra bits. But, as you all know, stuff happens. For reasons not worth
recounting they didn't get posted when available weeks ago, and I didn't
want to risk waiting till the last moment before the deadline when my
memory might have failed.
[mailto:owner-stds-802-sec@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG] On Behalf Of Roger B.
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 4:15 PM
Subject: Re: [802SEC] P802.3at PAR and Five Criteria (Residential
I agree 100%.
If the WG Chair were not so accommodating as Bob, I would refer my WG
to his SEC note, e.g.:
which includes the URLs.
At 00:03 +0000 2005-02-11, Tony Jeffree wrote:
>At 23:45 10/02/2005, Grow, Bob wrote:
>>I will supply you with a URL for these documents when they are
>>posted to our public web pages.
>I would very much appreciate that - it would save me either
>gratuitously overloading WG members' in-trays, or having to put
>copies of the files on the 802.1 website.
>Other WG Chairs that have recently circulated PARs/5C's PLEASE NOTE
>- we seem to be repeatedly having this conversation (agreeing to
>circulate URLs, NOT files) but there are precious few that actually
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector.
This list is maintained by Listserv.
This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.