Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [802SEC] ************** Straw Poll on EC Teleconferences ***************...



Title: Message
Jerry,  You bring up an excellent point that perhaps applies across the board for all voting.  Should we perhaps allow a WG Chair to designate a duly elected Vice Chair to serve as his alternate in such cases when he is unavailable.  That would seem to provide a means to ensure WG representation on a more secure basis.  Any SEC member can get sick or have an unavoidable conflict or get hit by a bus, etc.  Shouldn't we allow for predesignated back-ups just for such cases ??? 
 

Thanx,  Buzz
Dr. Everett O. (Buzz) Rigsbee
Boeing - SSG
PO Box 3707, M/S: 7M-FM
Seattle, WA  98124-2207
(425) 865-2443    Fx: (425) 865-6721
Cell: (425) 417-1022
everett.o.rigsbee@boeing.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry1upton@AOL.COM [mailto:Jerry1upton@AOL.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 10:13 AM
To: STDS-802-SEC@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
Subject: Re: [802SEC] ************** Straw Poll on EC Teleconferences ***************...

Mat,
I request that we vote the "Meetings by Teleconference" as a separate item from the overall proposed changes.
My past experience on other "Boards" gives me significant concerns on this proposal.
 
1. Regardless of the notice given, people travel and are unavailable for the calls at the times scheduled. Other Boards address this issue by having assigned alternates who can vote for the primary person. In our case we have no alternates to vote for us. Other Boards also set a higher level of approval votes for teleconference votes. For example 50% Yes votes of all eligible members regardless of how many members are on the call is used by some organizations.
 
2. We already have two methods/venues for voting. We vote at Plenary sessions. We vote by email ballot including ballots of short duration. Therefore I do not see the reason for another method particularly without addressing the concerns in point number 1.
 
Therefore I would currently oppose this P&P change.
Regards,
Jerry Upton
 
 
In a message dated 2/20/2005 4:32:16 PM Central Standard Time, matthew.sherman@BAESYSTEMS.COM writes:

EC Members,

I am concerned that opposition on certain subtopics of the EC Membership and Meetings’ P&P Revision ballot may be so strong as to defeat the whole ballot.  Accordingly I wish to conduct a quick strawpoll on the following.

Is your opposition to the following text so strong that you would vote against the ‘EC Membership and Meetings’ revision ballot regardless of its other content?

7.1.5.2   Meetings by Teleconference

Teleconference meetings of the EC may be held.  Any teleconference meeting where formal business is conducted shall be announced along with an agenda identifying topics to be addressed 30 days in advance on the EC reflector.  No formal actions can be taken on items not included on the announced agenda.  The teleconference shall be announced by the EC Chair or his designee.  Quorum and voting requirements of section 7.1.4 shall apply.  Openness requirements apply.


If the answer to this question is yes, please send me a quick e-mail so I can tally the opposition.  If the answer is no, you need not reply.

Thanks,

Mat


Matthew Sherman, Ph.D.

Senior Member Technical Staff

BAE SYSTEMS, CNIR

Office: +1 973.633.6344

email: matthew.sherman@baesystems.com

---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.
---------- This email is sent from the 802 Executive Committee email reflector. This list is maintained by Listserv.