| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Bob, Unfortunately I could not get on the call
Tuesday night, and maybe this could have been resolved. But I cannot understand
why we are keeping two sections, 8.4.1 and 8.4.2, pertaining to Certification when
we voted not to complete a Certification section. Possibly the remainder of 8.4
is OK but I don’t know who would assign Vendor (manufacturer?) numbers. Design
goal B6 is moot if there is no Certification process. “Reserved for Future Use” is
not a sufficient reason, in my view. If those leading some later revision of
the standard decide to incorporate a Certification process, these fields may or
may not be deemed appropriate. I am attaching a markup of the document
with assorted changes, most of which are editorial but which will come up when
we send the document to IEEE-SA if we don’t fix them here. Thanks again for your tireless leadership. Alex From: upamd@xxxxxxxx
[mailto:upamd@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bob
Davis UPAMD, This is the start of the Working Group Ballot for the Draft
of the UPAMD Standard. The draft document is on the UPAMD website as http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/msc/upamd/private/UPAMDDrafts/UPAMD_P1823Draft_201208290000vote.pdf. The following rules will be used for this Working Group
Ballot. Members with Voting Membership status, as tabulated in http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/msc/upamd/private/ MemberList20120828.xls, may:1. Vote to Approve the Draft, with or without Comments. 2. Vote to Disapprove the Draft with comments specifying the changes required in the draft, with necessary text, to change their vote from Disapprove to Approve. Other members of the UPAMD working group, and any other
interested party, may submit comments against the draft that will be addressed
by the working group. All voting, and comment responses, are to be submitted to upamd-vote@xxxxxxxx where they will be
archived and available to all members. Please send your responses in time for review at the 11
September Working group meeting. Overview and Status of the Working Group can be found at http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/msc/upamd/pub_docs/TBD.pdf.
This is updated as changes are made. When consensus is achieved on the Draft, a vote to
report the Draft for Sponsor Ballot will be needed. That ballot requires
a 2/3 majority approval of the Voting Members. Respectfully; Bob
Davis Chair
UPAMD/P1823 bobd@xxxxxxxx 408.353.5990
desk 408.857.1273
cell bob.davis.scsi.com
Skype |
Attachment:
UPAMD_P1823Draft_201208290000voteAWS.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document