| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
There is also "unit of least precision"It might also be important to Google both the phrase and the acronym to make sure the acronym is also used in the counted references.
<https://www.google.com/search?q=%22unit+in+the+last+place%22#sclient=psy-ab&q=%22unit+in+the+last+place%22+ulp&oq=%22unit+in+the+last+place%22+ulp&gs_l=serp.3..0i22i30.16009.17534.0.18629.4.4.0.0.0.0.67.260.4.4.0....0...1c.1.21.psy-ab.4NsC7XhHPNU&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.49405654,d.cGE&fp=ba86f2b6cfa1d236&biw=1393&bih=788> On 7/17/13 5:14 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2013-07-17 14:06:52 +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:Results may be country-based, but such a difference is strange anyway. https://www.google.com/search?q=%22unit+in+the+last+place%22 giving 375 000 results https://www.google.com/search?q=%22unit+in+the+last+position%22 giving 2 580 000 resultsWikipedia[*] and some other documents also give "unit of least precision". https://www.google.com/search?q=%22unit+of+least+precision%22 giving 26 000 results [*] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_in_the_last_place which has some errors, BTW.