Re: Motion P1788/0022.01: ContinuityBit -- discussion perios begins
Hi P1788
On 13 Sep 2010, at 03:14, Corliss, George wrote:
> On Sep 12, 2010, at 9:02 PM, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:
>> Can someone help me at this point? If John concurs, can this be counted
>> as a friendly amendment, and we continue the discussion on the
>> amended motion without resetting the clock?
> Yes, but I gather from a couple of John's messages that he might not accept it as a friendly amendment.
>
> If John does not accept this as an amendment, my interpretation of our Policies and Procedures is that you table M0022.01, open a 3 week discussion period on this amendment (I suggest M0022.01.Amend001.01, to allow room for growth). At the end of 3 weeks discussion of the amendment, we enter a 3 week voting period on the amendment.
>
> I see nothing in our P&P that provides for any shortened process.
I do not accept this as a friendly amendment. I want it to enter its discussion period. If the discussion shows a clear majority for Nate's view I will accept it as a FA. If the reverse, Nate might withdraw his amendment but that's his decision. Otherwise let it go to vote.
John